Tomahawks to Ukraine. What's going to happen if the United States isn't a conflict and we need the Tomahawks?

Well, that's a problem. We need Tomahawks and we need a lot of other things that we've been sending over the last four years to Ukraine.

We've been, you know, we gave them a lot. Now we have a different situation.

We send it to the European Union. They pay for it and all that, and they have plenty of money. Tomahawks, and we need a lot of other things that we've been sending over the last four years to Ukraine. We've been, you know, we gave, we gave them a lot. Now we have a different situation. We send it to the European Union. They pay for it.

One thing I have to say, we want Tomahawks also.

We don't want to be giving away things that we need to protect our country.

We have a very strong country right now.

We have a strong military.

We have the greatest military in the world.

We have the greatest weapons in the world.

I want to get this war over.

One of the issues that the indictment raises is that not only was this information exposed

to his wife and daughter, it was exposed to the Iranians because one of his email accounts

was hacked. And what I've learned is that that is one way that the United States discovered

that there was this classified information

on Bolton's AOL account is because they had a penetration. The U.S. intelligence community had a

penetration of an Iranian system, and they came across these emails, and that sort of fueled

this investigation. And there was a debate in the Biden administration about whether they

could even move forward in this case, because it would require essentially disclosing to the Iranians that the U.S. had that penetration. That's a big deal. That's not often done. But the Trump Justice Department decided that it was worth it to pursue this case against John Bolton likely knew that this information should not have been spread further, that there was

sort of an attempt to say, don't share this, and then there was a sort of tongue-in-cheek in the

response, but explain to us why that could or could not factor in here.

So the power of a document like that or evidence like that is really the government's ability

...