Very quickly. It's not about somebody who is staying, just staying and something like some forces. No, I'm not supportive this idea. I'm supporting the idea of contingence like a part of security guarantees. Because if they have 1 million point 5 army,

and if we will have less two times, it means that we need contingents

with a very strong number of soldiers.

200,000 from all the Europeans, of 200,000, it's a minimum.

It's a minimum.

Otherwise, it's nothing.

Otherwise, it's something, you know, like somebody, like we had OSCE, and nobody knew where they can help you.

Just they had offices and that's all.

It's great if we will have troops.

But we have to understand that the troops will not be in the center of the capital. Yes.

They will not have relaxed time.

Yes, it's very important because I heard that some allies said that, yes, but it's okay, we can be in the center of some city.

No, no, no, we don't need such contingent. You want the front line?

Yes, without our people.

Of course, yes, because this means security and that's it.

But it can't be.

It can't be without the United States.

I will explain you why.

Even if some European

France think that it can be, no it will not be. First of all, nobody will

risk without the United States. The second that what can divide NATO, divide EU and USA.

That is a goal and dream of Putin to divide this unity.

...