Episode 253 Promo - Responding to the Right (w/ Nathan J. Robinson)
Bad Faith
Bad Faith
4.5 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 20 February 2023
⏱️ 6 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Briahna enlists the help of Nathan J. Robinson, Editor-in-Chief of Current Affairs and author of the new book Responding to the Right: Brief Replies to 25 Conservative Arguments to push back against common right-leaning arguments that have emerged in the wake of the East Palestine train derailment and other current events. Is regulators' failures proof that government is corrupt and we're better off without it? Also, should AOC debate Majorie Taylor Greene, and if so, how would Nathan prep her? Should Briahna debate Ben Shaprio? And if yes, what would hep her reach the best result for the left? Also, what's the libertarian socialist take on covid vaccines?
Subscribe to Bad Faith on YouTube to access our full video library. Find Bad Faith on Twitter (@badfaithpod) and Instagram (@badfaithpod).
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Here's the crazy thing. I reported on the Abdul Al-Sahid campaign in Michigan a couple of years ago, |
| 0:04.8 | and the weekend I was out there, AOC was out there on the campaign trail with him giving speeches. |
| 0:09.0 | And the thing that struck me when I saw her live speaking, the only couple of times I have, |
| 0:13.2 | was she was the best public speaker I have ever seen in my life. |
| 0:16.1 | An Abdul Al-Sahid is a fantastic public speaker. Very, very good. She was better. She's really, |
| 0:21.3 | really good at public speaking when she wants to be. She's very, very charismatic. She's very |
| 0:25.6 | skilled at articulating her political positions. And so when she does that, when she shies away |
| 0:33.2 | from debate, I think there's this fear that we can't win. We've almost accepted the right's |
| 0:39.5 | view that like if we had a debate, we wouldn't do well in it. And I don't think that's correct. |
| 0:45.2 | Like I think if you train for it, I think she'd be better at a debate than I would be because |
| 0:50.7 | she's a really good public speaker. And I'm kind of a hesitant public speaker sometimes. |
| 0:55.2 | But I think she could win. So I think if she did, that would make our side look really good. |
| 1:01.2 | If you just embarrassed, if you just exposed all the stupid things that Marjorie Taylor |
| 1:04.8 | Green believes and said like, well, the things that she believes are wrong are the right way |
| 1:09.9 | things that you should reject. And the things that she believes that are correct, we believe on the left. |
| 1:15.2 | So just come and join the left to forget Marjorie Taylor Green's politics. She could do that. |
| 1:20.0 | And I think she could do really well. So why not do it? |
| 1:22.2 | Do you think there's an argument that she has more to lose than she does to win? |
| 1:26.2 | We do have a lot to lose. I get that. Like if you go up in one of these debates and you don't do well |
| 1:32.0 | and you get humiliated and embarrassed, yeah, it's really bad for your side. So they're pretty high |
| 1:36.4 | risk. But that's why you shouldn't lose. Okay, so if you were training ASC for this hypothetical |
| 1:41.8 | debate with Marjorie Taylor Green, let's take some lessons from this book that you've written. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Bad Faith, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Bad Faith and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

