I spend a lot of time as Starbucks just working and I get to watch all the orders that people are putting in and picking up and at some point I realize that Starbucks is basically a liquid candy store for women.

Now, men do buy things at Starbucks.

Do you know what the men buy at the Starbucks?

Coffee?

Do you know what the women buy?

A big old cup of sugar that has you know any variety of names but the women are just

coming in for liquid candy and the men are coming in for probably something

closer to coffee.

Anyway, it's a pretty big difference.

The Ninth Circuit has ruled, according to Bright Barth, they have a story here about that even a felon has the right to possess a firearm for self-defense.

So a three-judge panel in the United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit said that this guy

Stephen Duarte has a right. Now I was not terribly interested in this specific

case but you know how everything is related to everything?

And I'm trying to figure out, is the Ninth Circuit the one that is famously liberal?

Can you give me a fact check on that?

In the back of my mind, I'm thinking,

is that true that the Ninth Circuit is famously

considered a liberal court or do I have that wrong?

I'm seeing some confirmation of that.

Now why would you, why would you expect a liberal lead in court to say that a felon could have the right to own a gun?

That's you typically expect it to go the other way, wouldn't you?

Is there anything that would make you think that maybe there's something else going on with this story? Is there a case of a certain son of a president who was also a

...