meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Philosophize This!

Episode #124 ... Simulacra and Simulation

Philosophize This!

Stephen West

Philosophy, Society & Culture, Education

4.817.1K Ratings

🗓️ 25 October 2018

⏱️ 30 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today we begin our discussion of Jean Baudrillard's book Simulacra and Simulation. Thank you so much for listening! Could never do this without your help.  Website: https://www.philosophizethis.org/ Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/philosophizethis  Social: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/philosophizethispodcast X: https://twitter.com/iamstephenwest Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/philosophizethisshow Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello everyone, I'm Stephen West. This is Philosophies this. This show is made possible by people that

0:05.5

support it using the service Patreon, a crowdfunding platform for episodic content like this show.

0:10.5

Joe's also made possible by people that go through the Amazon banner,

0:13.3

located on the front page of Philosophiesys.org. Today's episode is the beginning of a look

0:18.6

into what at the time was a new attitude that's emerging in the post-structuralist world.

0:22.9

We're looking at the book Simulacra and Simulation by Jean-Baud Riyard. I hope you love the show today.

0:28.6

So for the sake of time at the beginning here, I need to move pretty quickly through

0:31.5

several points we've already covered on the show without re-explaining them. So if any of this

0:35.1

seems like it needs more explanation, you can always go back and listen to all the episodes we've

0:39.1

done so far on structuralism and post-structuralism. But for the sake of right now, we just talked about

0:44.4

Foucault's work. His famous genealogies and archaeologies are the way we've looked at madness

0:49.3

and criminal punishment and sexuality. And while there's a lot of subtext to these works,

0:54.0

one of the major points Foucault's making with these books overall is that terms like

0:58.4

sanity versus insanity, heterosexual versus homosexual, a criminal mind versus a mind that's

1:04.8

been properly reformed. These are just three of hundreds of different new ways in our modern world

1:10.8

that science categorizes human beings and labels them normal or abnormal in an attempt to

1:16.1

classify and understand them. And that just in the relatively short period of recorded human

1:20.6

history that we have access to, there's no shortage of examples Foucault can point to of societies

1:25.6

that just never used these terms to categorize people. Nobody ever used to classify people in these

1:31.2

terms. They had their own terms they used to categorize people, and we can see that those terms

1:36.0

had huge effects on the way these groups were treated within those societies. But aside from

1:40.4

pointing out that our new scientific categories similarly affect the way people are looked at in our

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Stephen West, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Stephen West and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.