meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast

Episode 102: All About Gerrymandering — with Sean Trende

The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast

National Review

Music, News, Arts, Music History, Books, Politics

5.01000 Ratings

🗓️ 22 April 2026

⏱️ 37 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

After the success of the Virginia gerrymander, Charles asks Sean Trende about the history of gerrymandering. What is it? Why is it called that? When did it start? What is a dummymander? When did our modern gerrymandering fights begin? Is mid-decade redistricting a historical anomaly? Who is playing defense here: the Democrats or the Republicans? Why have Republicans opposed federal laws banning gerrymandering? Are independent commissions actually independent? Can we outsource redistricting to a computer? What happens if the Supreme Court reworks its Voting Rights Act jurisprudence? Should we just go back to having representatives-at-large, who run statewide? Did the 2020 Census unfairly undercount gains in Republican states? How will the 2030 Census change our politics? Also: Is Donald Trump unpopular because he's Donald Trump, or because we just hate everyone now? And where are all the moderates?

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

My guest today is Sean Trendy, senior elections analyst at Real Clear Politics, and the co-host of the Stubborn Things podcast with Jay Cost.

0:30.0

Sean, welcome to the, well, welcome back to the Charles C.W. Cook podcast.

0:34.7

Yeah, thanks for having me. I'm excited.

0:37.2

All right. So Twitter, as ever, is a buzz this time with last night's referendum in Virginia,

0:47.4

which temporarily amended the state constitution to allow the legislature to pass what is, irrespective of one's political

0:57.5

opinions of it, one of the most egregious and consciously egregious gerrymanders that I have

1:05.3

ever seen. And this morning, the fight seems to be over whether or not this was done in self-defense or whether it was an escalation.

1:19.4

And what I want to do is back away for the moment from that transient fight and ask some foundational questions to put what's happening into context.

1:29.3

So let me start by asking you a 30,000 feed. What is a gerrymander?

1:38.3

Boy, I wish there were a 30,000 foot answer. You know, it drives me nuts because everyone on Twitter is like, well, we should just end gerrymandering.

1:48.0

And political scientists don't even agree on what a gerrymander is. At a 50,000 foot level, I think most people agree it's drawing congressional districts in such a way that they artificially enhance the power of one party

2:03.6

at another party's expense. There's debates over whether you have to intend to do it.

2:08.8

There's debates when we say artificially enhance the party's power with respect to what.

2:15.4

But I think at a high level to get a conversation started that'll work okay

2:19.5

it's cool gerrymandering after elbridge gerry and a district that was drawn by him or for him

2:29.1

that looked like a salamander that's right there was a so in massachusetts there was there was a, I always hate using my hands, but people

2:37.4

won't be able to see it. But in Massachusetts, this district was drawn to favor Elbridge Gary. It's

2:42.7

kind of like, we call it a GIF, even though it was originally a GIF. This is a gerrymander,

2:47.9

not a gerrymander. But there was a series of towns in Massachusetts

2:51.3

that were strung together in a serpentine fashion to be a district that he'd be likely to win.

2:57.2

And some enterprising political cartoonist drew wings on it and a salamanders head at the end with

3:04.8

a flicking tail and it became the gerrymander.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Review, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of National Review and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.