Democrats and journalists, but I repeat myself, are furiously accusing the Trump administration

of giving conflicting explanations for the killing of terrorists later, Cosm Soleimani.

Pencil Neck McCarthy, Adam Schiff, went on meet the press with NBC anchor man Chuck Kregelis

and actually managed to keep a straight face, as he said, quote, administration officials

keep changing their story.

First, they said they killed Soleimani because he was going to kill Americans.

Then they said it was because he was going to bomb American embassies.

Then they said it was because he was going to launch terrorist attacks against Americans.

Well, which is it?

After all, we can't rest easy knowing this violent psychopathic murderer of our countryman

may have been harmed unjustly.

Unquote.

In an op-ed in the New York Times, a former newspaper, editor-in-chief blithering

provocation, the third wrote, quote, the state department said Soleimani planned imminent

attacks, but given their deplorable English pronunciation, it was impossible to tell whether

they meant IMMAMEN-ENT, and thus the attack was indwelling and inherent.

What?

What?

They meant it was an imminent attack being high in station, rank or repute, but whether

they actually were trying to imply that Mr. Soleimani was planning to attack us in

the near future, which of course would be an entirely different spelling than the others.

These are the things that should be keeping America up at night, not trifling matters like

...