Hey Glenn, and I guess I'm Throne's listeners. I'm just recording this kind of to document

my thoughts about what it means to be mindfully angry and what mindful anger means versus

unhealthy anger. I'm heavily into Buddhism and studying Buddhism and there's often this

kind of, I guess it's paradox that arises, meaning that if your Buddhist, you know, you

shouldn't be angry and you can't be angry and Glenn was kind of teasing me about that.

I'm healthy angry. I'm healthy angry.

There is some truth to that, but I think anger can also be healthy, especially when you're

in situations that like abuse or in my case exiting a fundamentalist religion, when you

allow yourself to feel what you're feeling without trying to fight it, without trying to invalidate

it.

I'm healthy angry. I'm healthy angry.

And that's what I've kind of been debating with Glenn about. Where Glenn says, you know,

don't be angry, why be angry, you know, some people can do that. I am a very emotional

person. I'm very passionate about things and I get really angry sometimes.

I'm healthy angry. I'm healthy angry.

Glenn's way can work, you know, when people are trying to dwell on that anger and go back

to a continuing, continually, I agree with him. But I also think that sometimes those

people need to be validated too, so that anger can just process in their mind and they

can move on.

This is infants on thrones, baby steps, who are sought to preach to you.

The philosophies of men, mingled with humor, mingled with humor, mingled with humor, we are

evolving.

...