meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Full Measure After Hours

EP 026 | Pre-analysis of The Horowitz Report and 5 Things to Remember When You Hear the News

Full Measure After Hours

Sharyl Attkisson

News, News Commentary

4.91.4K Ratings

🗓️ 9 December 2019

⏱️ 22 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

I look back at the track record of Inspector General Michael Horowitz to give a pre-analysis of what tomorrow's report on alleged government surveillance abuse of the Trump campaign might show. I also include a guide of things to remember when you're watching and reading news coverage of the report. Subscribe to "The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast" and "Full Measure After Hours." Visit SharylAttkisson.com for more original reporting. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/sharylattkisson/support See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi everybody Cheryl Ackison here with another edition of the Cheryl Ackison

0:10.7

Podcast.

0:12.9

The long-awaited report from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz about the alleged

0:18.9

FISA abuse or surveillance abuse is soon to be released. I thought I would offer a brief

0:24.8

pre-analysis before the report is made public. First I think there are five key things for you to remember as you hear and read the

0:37.8

news stories and the analyses about the findings. First of all, most news reporters and analysts who comment on the Horowitz report will not have read it.

0:48.0

They will rely on other news reports, other news reporters, what they're saying, and or spin provided by partisans and others with vested interests.

0:56.5

This is important to keep in mind as you hear them speak with authority or supposed authority about what's in the report.

1:04.0

Number two, most news reporters and analysts who do read any part of the report

1:09.5

will only have reviewed the summary and or the conclusion, something you can do yourself if you find a copy

1:15.6

and I'll try to post it on my website at Cheryl Ackison.com as soon as I can get a copy of it to post. Some of those who read those sections, the summary and or

1:26.2

conclusion may also read partial sections pointed out to them by partisans and others with

1:31.7

vested interests to prove their particular points.

1:34.2

Again, keep this in mind when you hear people giving their analyses.

1:39.2

Number three, the report will likely offer plenty of criticism, but if the past is any guide, it will

1:46.6

often accept the most innocent explanation for any inappropriate act barring an explicit admission of the contrary.

1:54.9

In other words, in the past, if an official has been found to have done something wrong or

1:59.6

improper or suspicious, but he simply tells the Inspector General he accidentally destroyed the documents

2:06.7

that would prove something or that he doesn't recall something.

2:11.1

It is often that which is accepted as the explanation that, well, there's nothing

2:15.2

to prove otherwise, so we have to believe that intentions were pure or that anything that

2:20.4

happened that was wrong was accidental and not nefarious.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Sharyl Attkisson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Sharyl Attkisson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.