meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Emergency Powers and Civil LIberties During a Pandemic

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 26 March 2020

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Vigilance toward overweening government is no less important during a pandemic. Cato's Patrick Eddington discusses some federal efforts to claim emergency powers.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Thursday, March 26, 2020. I'm Caleb Brown. The Civil Liberties

0:06.6

implications of a pandemic are hard to overstate. Governors ordering the closure of businesses

0:11.9

imposing restrictions on the kinds of activities

0:14.6

people can share with each other, and of course federal law enforcers seeking special powers.

0:20.3

However much these actions might make sense over a brief time period, how best to keep them for becoming a long-term ratcheting up of government authority.

0:29.0

Cato's Patrick Eddington comments.

0:31.0

I've seen a lot of police departments talking about what they won't be

0:37.3

responding to in the in the coming weeks and some of those are you know certain fender benders certain kinds of

0:49.5

mistreatment of intentional mistreatment of one another that they won't be responding to and

0:56.7

yet on the flip side the feds you see a lot of move to get emergency powers. So what do you make of those efforts

1:09.6

so far and do any of them make sense to you?

1:14.0

Well, I don't think there's any question that, you know,

1:18.0

the stay-at-home orders and all the rest of that,

1:20.0

given the nature of the virus right now are clearly steps that actually need to be taken.

1:25.8

And I think it's a good news story that we're seeing, as you indicated, police departments and other law enforcement related entities basically saying they're not going to enforce what some are referring to his quality of life crimes or you know things of that nature.

1:42.0

I think that's great. What has me deeply concerned

1:45.2

quite frankly is this political piece that ran on March 24th by Josh Gerstein

1:52.1

the headline of which is those who intentionally spread

1:55.3

coronavirus could be charged as terrorists. The subhead, the Justice

1:59.7

Department offers guidance on how to deal with, quote, purposeful exposure and infection of others end quote and they're clearly you know drawing on

2:08.5

War on terror language and experience here and the the political piece goes on to quote a memo that was sent out by Deputy Attorney General Jeff Rosen to U.S. attorneys across the country

2:21.6

quote because coronavirus appears to meet the statutory definition of a quote biological agent and quote, such acts potentially could implicate the nation's terrorism related statutes.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.