Drilling Deep: Jessica Green on Why We Need More Confrontation at COP
Drilled
Pushkin Industries
4.6 • 2.4K Ratings
🗓️ 17 November 2025
⏱️ 47 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
After four decades of the United Nations climate conference COP, progress on global climate action remains slow. So what isn't working? How is it possible that so much fanfare, so many words, and so much work—much of it genuine and good-faith—has amounted to such little progress?
University of Toronto political science professor Jessica F. Green has some ideas. In Existential Politics: Why Global Climate Institutions Are Failing and How to Fix Them, the longtime observer of global climate negotiations and expert on carbon accounting argues that the COP embodies a “win-win” approach to a problem for which someone has to lose. The challenge is to make sure the right people (and planet) do the winning, while the “fossil asset owners,” as Green describes them, do the losing.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello and welcome back to Drilled. I'm Amy Westervelt. |
| 0:09.5 | Today we are bringing you another episode in our series Drilling Deep in which we look at different books that are coming out, either on climate or on science or history, democracy, all of the things |
| 0:21.9 | that we kind of look at here on Drilled. |
| 0:25.5 | Most of the time these interviews are being done by Adam Lowenstein. |
| 0:30.6 | Bless him, he's reading all the books and talking to all the authors and having these |
| 0:33.8 | very, very interesting conversations. |
| 0:36.7 | Today we're bringing you a book that has a lot |
| 0:38.6 | to do with what's happening in climate politics at the moment because the annual conference of the |
| 0:44.4 | parties, the UN Climate Summit, is underway at the moment in Brazil. And it's a good time to look at |
| 0:51.3 | how that process has been politicized. In the book Existential Politics, |
| 0:57.0 | Jessica F. Green from the University of Toronto argues that head-on conflict with fossil fuel |
| 1:02.5 | interests is a prerequisite for real progress. Green is a longtime observer of global climate |
| 1:09.8 | negotiations and expert on carbon accounting, and she argues that the COP is a longtime observer of global climate negotiations and an expert on carbon accounting, |
| 1:13.3 | and she argues that the cop embodies a win-win approach to the problem of the climate crisis |
| 1:18.7 | and the transitions necessary to deal with it, for which someone has to lose. |
| 1:25.3 | The challenge then is to make sure the right people do the winning. Well, the |
| 1:29.7 | fossil asset owners, as Green describes them, do the losing. Adam had a really interesting |
| 1:35.1 | conversation with Green, who's someone that I've also spoken with in the past about cop proceedings. |
| 1:40.7 | She's really, really, really interesting on this stuff. I think you'll enjoy this chat. |
| 1:45.6 | It's coming up after this quick break. One thing I was curious about as I was reading the book is what the, what drove you to write this book? |
| 2:13.4 | Because it's incredibly complex stuff, as we were discussing a few minutes ago. |
| 2:19.2 | It's not uplifting. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Pushkin Industries, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Pushkin Industries and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

