Hey, everybody. It is Nick Houselman here, and we are doing a very special live broadcast of the

Muckrake podcast. And it's going across everywhere at Twitter, on Patreon, on YouTube. Thank you all for

being part of this. And I'm really excited because we have Paul Wasserman here, who is, among other things,

a former prosecutor, a criminal defense attorney, and now is an adjunct professor

of criminal law at Cal State University Fullerton. So Paul, thanks for jumping on here.

We have a lot to unpack because we just got the indictment unsealed.

Yeah, interesting stuff. I mean, may you live in interesting times. This is clearly interesting

times. Well, clearly interesting times.

Well, I hope we can make this interesting only because it does seem a little bit like there's missing something in there.

I mean, we're not getting the real juicy stuff here.

But I actually wrote it all out because I kind of was curious as far as the dates go.

But a brief overview, if I got this correct, is they really just listed a whole bunch of

the same crime over and over and over again.

Is that fair to say?

Yeah, correct.

That's what it appears to be.

I mean, they're each different actions, right?

They're each related to individual actions that he did entering entries into different

business records.

Things as mundane is literally onto the check stuff, entering that into the record. But I think it's important to know that this is

something common that my understanding is, now I'm California attorney, but my understanding in the

reading is that this is something common, the New York charges to business organizations and people

...