4.8 • 826 Ratings
🗓️ 18 June 2018
⏱️ 29 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Dr. Leighton Flowers, Director of Evangelism and Apologetics for Texas Baptists, addresses an article written by a Calvinistic author regarding "the 12 myths about Calvinism," which can be seen here:
https://credohouse.org/blog/12-myths-calvinism#comments
This is part 3 of 12 in the series and Dr. Flowers looks at the logical consistency of Calvinists who claim God is not the author of evil while maintaining a view of deterministic sovereignty.
For more on this topic please visit www.soteriology101.com
To SUPPORT this ministry please go here: https://soteriology101.com/support/
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | So am I wrong for thinking that a choice is not for real? |
0:08.4 | Now am I wrong for thinking we're responsible when we see? |
0:16.0 | That's just why it's real. |
0:17.9 | It's time for the Soteriology 101 podcast, where God is most glorified by his love and provision for all people. |
0:26.4 | Welcome your host. |
0:27.8 | The director of apologetics for Texas Baptists, an adjunct professor of theology, and a local teaching pastor. |
0:34.9 | Dr. Layton Flowers. |
0:36.9 | Hello, and welcome back to S to Sociology 101. We want to |
0:40.1 | continue in our series on the 12 myths about Calvinism, where we're answering a good Calvinistic |
0:45.4 | brother named Michael Patton with Cretel House Ministries. And he's going through what he feels are |
0:50.0 | common objections against Calvinism, myths about Calvinism. And we're examining them from our |
0:55.1 | perspective. And we're trying to be obviously cordial and kind in doing that. We need to do that |
0:59.1 | with brothers in Christ. We're simply saying we disagree with your conclusions here and here's why. |
1:05.1 | And this has to do with what we call logical consistencies. In other words, if you believe these |
1:10.1 | things, then we think it's logically |
1:12.0 | consistent that you have to hold to these other facts. That's what arguments are. And so it's not |
1:17.8 | accusatory. It's not trying to bemoan somebody or to demean them or to demonize them, which is too |
1:25.2 | often the case in these kinds of debates back and forth. And it can go both ways. |
1:29.3 | Sometimes I'm accused of being an open theist or someone who denies the internal knowledge of God |
1:35.4 | or someone who denies sovereignty or something like that. |
1:39.3 | And obviously, my statements are very clear that I affirm sovereignty, that I affirm omniscience. |
1:45.6 | But nevertheless, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Leighton Flowers, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Leighton Flowers and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.