For all you provisionists that were going, we need to have a debate and you've

have a debate right now.

Do you think you'd want to debate this?

I think you wanted to debate what Diagnitas's, what Mothaitase's view was in writing

to Diagnetus on these subjects?

This guy has a reformed anthropology, not a provisionist, not a traditionalist anthropology.

Who uses that phrase inability?

Well, it's not the provisionists, and it's not the Armenians, it's not the open theists,

or even the Pelagians or the semi-Palajians.

Inability.

That's a term you hear from them, monogistices.

Them monogists.

Yeah.

This guy's a monogist in the second century.

He's a monogist.

And Wilson's dissertation requires them all to be what?

Synergists.

I'm just reading you the stuff.

I'm just translating the original language for you.

Unbiased sources. That's what I mean by unbiased sources. So he's saying, here's what semi-Palachianism is. By a list of three or four unbiased sources, here's what we say.

Here's how these two things are different. So therefore, you shouldn't call us a semi-Palajian

based upon these definitions of your own sources. Okay. And the same point is true when it

...