Hello everybody and thank you for tuning in to the Liberty Report.

With us today we have Daniel Mick Adams, our co-host Daniel, welcome to the program.

We are still in our bunker Dr Paul. Good morning. How are you doing well going well we're going to talk a little bit today about the First Amendment not that people on the television hasn't talked about the First Amendment and there was a ruling recently dealing with the First Amendment.

It shouldn't be that confusing, you know, but it is they sort of mix it up and you know

another thing that gets mixed up, you know, this word sound thing.

Do you think we just saw an example of what word salad is if you're if you're thinking

about confusion and statements and then putting that in the terms of something

moral and right and correct and legal and what people are saying it gets to be a

job but anyway, this, what was done here was the 60 minutes took a statement by Kamala and then they doctored it up but they didn't put a saying on there.

They said, oh, we doctored this up and made people made people unhappy.

And some people will say, boy, they can't get away with this.

This is a pure First Amendment right.

I think it's a messy First Amendment right.

And I think that we have to think this through because you know is very significant about what people say and do on the television and who's going to regulate it.

There's one thing for sure.

There was deception going on in this case,

and when they switch the Amerit error, but is that a crime?

Is that part of the right of people's free speech?

This sort of thing.

And I think it's an interesting thing, but I certainly think the whole thing is deception and duplicitous, it's as a goal in there, and it's mean and nasty, and people are honorable by doing things like this.

But is it something that says,

you're violating the First Amendment

...