Hello everybody and thank you for tuning in to the Liberty Report with us today

with Daniel McAdams our co-host Daniel good to see you this morning.

Good morning Dr Paul how are you this morning?

Good digesting the news you, the Supreme Court's been busy, they didn't have anything

else to do so they thought they had tinker around elections and all these important things.

But you know what?

If the Supreme Court took upon themselves

to rule on everything done that is controversial

and whether or not it's proper under the Constitution, wouldn't that be a job.

But that doesn't happen but every once in a while they do something important.

The marketplace and the politician and others are very interested in the recent rulings and we talked about that and that's been big in the news.

But things are lingering as a consequence of this and the interpretation.

And you know we talked about the interpretation and we didn't challenge that it was unclear.

I mean we had to try to understand and look to other more expert

people to help us understand it but there there is now a new effort to try to understand it.

But I think the confusion comes from the fact

that now it's the politics that's going to interpret it.

And one of the articles we looked at today came from Zero Hedge.

And the title is Democrats Hint at assassination

assassination in response to

Supreme Court immunity decision.

They're you know that that means they're interpreting what we read about and talked about and experts read

...