Belgar and Mass 98.5.

I don't care about the number. The Sports Hub. Mass is out. Jim Murray's in the Maz chair. Tim McCones in the Update Studio. I think I've updated everyone and everything. Oh, I love that. Thank you, Maz. Again, a giveaway this segment for you. Something for free. So if you want something for free, pay attention. We go back to the phones, though. Dakota in Braintree, what Dakota?

All right, so Wick said on your show that he loves listening to you. So, Wick, I hope you're listening, because Michael, I need to call you out in this whole take. And you want to know why? Sure. Okay, because... No, why just call me out? Just call me out. Just go straight to the call-up. The original take was, would you include

Brad Stevens in a deal to get Davis here? And that's where it all started. And that was the

whole genesis of it that WIC started to go after you for. But then when WIC, when you realized that the

owner of the Boston Celtics might have some better knowledge of how to run an organization than you, you decided to take Brad Stevens and put him against a just a single person.

Okay.

Okay.

Well, we'll stop now.

But do you know why?

Do you know why I did that?

Yeah, because your original take.

No, no, no, Dakota shut up. Because the said, the owner said this. I didn't put these words in his mouth. I didn't make this up. The owner said it. The coach is as important as any superstar in the time. Okay, so he couldn't even get the words up before I disagreed with them. Shut up, shut up, shut up. Shush. Shush. I have a mute button. So if you don't shush, I'll shush you.

The owner said that the coach is as important as any superstar player.

He said that unprompted. That led to the debate.

So if he believes that, then the question is, would you rather have Brad Stevens or Kyrie Irving?

Would you rather have Brad Stevens or Steph Curry?

Would you rather have Brad Stevens or Jason Tatum?

So how is that unfair when the owner himself said that?

I think that you need to say, well, your original take was wrong, so you're going to move into a different take based upon

what the owner said, because you are 100% wrong with your Brad Stevens. I'd throw him into a deal to get Davis here in the Celtics. Why? No, why? Why? That original take was ludicrous. Why is that ludicrous? Let's say New Orleans says to you, wait a minute, we'll give you Anthony Davis. you can give us, and again, this is just, this is just an exercise, right? But it's a long way of saying, would you rather have Kyrie or Brad Stevens? Let's say New Orleans says, we will give you Anthony Davis if you give us Marcus Smart and Brad Stevens, or we'll give you, Anthony Davis, if you give us Marcus Smart and Kyrie Irving,

which one are you going to choose? Well, wouldn't it? I'm going to ask you a question.

...