meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
WSJ Opinion: Free Expression

Debates, October Surprises and the Coin-Flip Election

WSJ Opinion: Free Expression

Gerard Baker, Editor at Large, The Wall Street Journal

Society & Culture, News

4.6591 Ratings

🗓️ 3 October 2024

⏱️ 26 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

JD Vance and Tim Walz took to the debate stage for a substance-heavy debate that was in contrast, not only to the highly personalized debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris last month but also to all the rancorous presidential debates of the last few election cycles. Still, it's unlikely to make an iota of difference to the outcome of the election now just a month away. So what will decide the outcome of this coin-flip election? On this episode of the Free Expression podcast, Gerry Baker speaks with veteran pollster and consultant Whit Ayres about whether the polls will be accurate this time, whether Donald Trump is facing not just a gender gap, but a “gender chasm” with women voters, and how much race will be a factor in the 2024 Election. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

From the Opinion Pages of the Wall Street Journal, this is Free Expression with Jerry Baker.

0:08.0

Hello and welcome to Free Expression from the opinion page of the Wall Street Journal.

0:12.0

I'm Jerry Baker, editor at large of the journal. If you're not already subscribing to Free Expression,

0:16.0

please sign up at Apple, Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you do, you're listening.

0:19.0

This week, the coin flip election of 2024.

0:22.6

Discussing the differences between the Soviet political system and that of the West,

0:26.5

Nikita Krischoff, the Russian leader who succeeded Stalin, is once said to have commented,

0:31.1

the only problem with free elections is that you never know who's going to win them.

0:35.5

Well, these days, the United States has taken that

0:37.6

democratic uncertainty principle a step further. Now not only do we not know in advance who's

0:43.1

going to win elections. Today we don't even know who's won the election even after it's happened.

0:48.5

The last two presidential elections, as we know, were decided by a few tens of thousands of

0:52.0

votes in a small handful of states out of

0:54.3

well over 135 million votes cast. And if you thought that was close, all the evidence

1:00.4

is that this one, now just a month away, could be even closer. With a little over four weeks

1:06.8

now to go to polling day, the polls suggest that Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are locked in

1:10.8

what looks like a simple tie, both in the national polling and in the critical swing

1:15.4

states. According to the real clear politics polling average, Harris has a lead in the national

1:19.3

polls of about 2%. It's effectively a dead heat given margins of error. But more important in the

1:24.3

seven states that will decide the outcome, we have a situation

1:27.7

where Trump leads in three, Harris leads in three, and one, perhaps the most critical of

1:33.0

all Pennsylvania, the race is literally tied.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Gerard Baker, Editor at Large, The Wall Street Journal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Gerard Baker, Editor at Large, The Wall Street Journal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.