AI has apparently killed a 133-year-old tradition at Princeton.

That may be a sign of the Times.

The Chinese Communist Party is rewriting the Bible.

Former Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse models what it means to die with dignity.

And a new study reveals that nearly two and five Americans want no contact

with a loved one this year. These are the stories we'll discuss and we'll also address some of

your questions. I'm your host Sean McDowell and filling in for the one and only Scott Ray.

Back is theology professor, author friend Thaddeus Williams. Dad, good to have you on, buddy. Hey, man, Scott's shoes

are big to fill, but I'll do my best. Well, you always do awesome and people say that, so we're

good to have you back. Let's jump into this story, eager to get your take on this. I saw this in

both the Atlantic and in the Wall Street Journal.

And apparently, the title is how AI killed a 133 old Princeton tradition.

In 1876, like 150 years ago, an editorial in Princeton's newly founded campus newspaper argued that the use of proctors against the use of proctors to monitor exams.

It was, quote, a means of bad moral education, the author wrote. So treat students as presumptively dishonest and some would become so. Treat them as, and they would learn to behave honorably.

And so the editorial board suggested a different approach, quote, let every man write at the end of his paper a pledge that he has neither given nor received help,

and let professors and tutors address themselves to some better business than watching for fraud.

Well, that was adopted in 1893.

Well, that seems to be changing.

When students take their final exams, it was, professors used to leave the room, which is crazy,

and students write a pledge that they didn't cheat.

And if there are suspected cheaters, they would go before a jury of their own peers, interestingly enough.

Well, it seems like it had a good run, but again, it's changing.

...