Critical HIt #189: Podcast@MajorSpoilers.com

Critical Hit: A Major Spoilers Real Play RPG Podcast

Stephen Schleicher

Leisure, Games

4.9 • 2.6K Ratings

🗓️ 2 March 2013

⏱️ 85 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This episode of Critical Hit: While we all eagerly await the fate of our favorite table top game, the players and game master take some time to answer listener mail.

A big Thank You goes out to everyone who downloads, subscribes, listens, and supports this show. We really appreciate you taking the time to listen to our ramblings each week. Tell your friends about the podcast, get them to subscribe and, be sure to visit the Major Spoilers site and forums.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Welcome to Critic Lidemater's Poilers Dungeons & Dragons podcast. Thank you so much for downloading
0:18.6	and oh my gosh last week. Things ended in such a way that I know many of you are on your
0:31.2	seats and screaming at Twitter and screaming on the Facebook and all over the place. And so
0:36.6	we want to get back into the action right after we answer. Listen to your email.
0:41.7	You're screaming too. Rod, we got this evil man. Don't cut me into this. Oh actually Steven in my
0:50.6	contract for Critical Hit I managed to talk him into me being able to play a Q&A card anytime.
0:57.7	And I only get a major cliffhanger moments and I do it specifically to torture the players.
1:03.8	Hey guys says Dan let me just say I'm a huge fan of the podcast. It's incredibly fun. Funny
1:08.1	and informative I love every second of it. I have one issue regarding my D&D group that I hope
1:13.0	you guys might have some helpful advice. In my group there are two of my friends who have both
1:17.1	been dungeon masters from other groups and taught by different people. So combined together there
1:22.3	tends to be a lot of arguing dispute during gameplay about who did it this way or who's
1:27.0	DM did what which is distracting and takes away from the fun and I just want to find a way to make it
1:32.6	thanks and keep up the good work. I added all the emphasis. Definitely could be an issue. I want
1:36.9	this one. Sure, let's let Adriana go knock it out of the park for us. Tell them not to do that.
1:44.9	Yes, you're welcome. Here's the thing. In this group has an answer of how to keep that from
1:55.0	happening. We need to have it happen in this group. Oh yeah with this group that Dan's talking
2:02.0	about. Because we kind of do that as well with the well what a maybe no well out mean art and I think
2:09.8	to a degree that's fine and that's to be expected. But Adriana is right. I mean if you've got that
2:16.2	level of detracting from what you're trying to do and they're arguing you know out of character
2:22.3	and they're having meta discussions tell them to knock at the f off. You know we have one simple
2:27.5	rule at major spoilers my site my rules. So why can't you as the DM say my game my rules when
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Stephen Schleicher, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Stephen Schleicher and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.