Building a coffee business?

Serving the best Americano in town is up to you.

But winning back time and growing your business, leave that to sum up.

Take orders and payments anywhere with the new SumUp Terminal.

Turn occasional customers into regulars with a free loyalty program.

And with the SumUp point of sale system, you'll always know when you're running low on your best-selling blends.

Visit sumup.co.uk to learn more.

I'm John Batchewitt, Professor Jonathan Adler, of Professor of Law at the William and Mary Law

School, discussing the ambition of the Trump administration under Administrator Zeldon at the EPA

to undo what is regarded as a misinterpretation, a mistake,

an inarticulate presentation about greenhouse gases as part of the endangerment

that needs to be corrected by the power of the EPA.

Professor, the Chevron decision, it would occur to me as a common sensical, non-legal mind

that the Chevron decision limits the ability of the EPA to make these rules.

And that because originally it said reasonably anticipate, That was an administrator who reasonably anticipated

once upon a time. It's a different administrator now. Can not Mr. Zeldon say, I don't find this

endangerment? Well, I think given the language of the statute, that's somewhat hard to do.

And that's for several reasons. One, the language of the statute says reasonably anticipate to endanger public health or welfare,

and then welfare in the statute is defined incredibly broadly, to include economic effects,

to include the climate itself, to include effects on ecosystems and the like.

And the language is not, and we've seen, there have been other cases where similar language has been interpreted in the Clean Air Act, the language is not, you know, are controls on

this source of pollution, a good idea, not do they pass the cost benefit test, not are the negative effects

...