meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

Coffee House Shots: who really runs No.10?

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 6 December 2025

⏱️ 24 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This weekend’s Coffee House Shots digs into the growing debate over whether Keir Starmer should tack left on the economy as voters peel away to the Greens and Lib Dems – and why some in Labour think its migration stance is now more popular with their own voters than ever. Are Labour tacking left?

But beyond policy, a deeper question looms: is Westminster’s obsession with ‘super-advisers’ drowning out the government’s message? Tom Baldwin argues that leaks, briefing wars and the hunt for the next ‘power-behind-the-throne’ are undermining Labour’s ability to tell a coherent story, while Tim Shipman asks why Starmer still struggles to communicate the values that drive him.

James Heale speaks to Tim Shipman and Tom Baldwin, Keir Starmer's biographer.

Produced by Oscar Edmondson.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Give something clever this Christmas.

0:02.2

Treat a loved one to a year of The Spectator, in print and online, for just £99.

0:07.9

And we'll send you a bottle of our very own English sparkling wine worth £48 £48, absolutely free.

0:15.3

Have a bright and sparkling Christmas with the Spectator.

0:17.7

Go to spectator.com.uk forward slash Christmas.

0:28.7

Hello and welcome to the special Saturday edition of Coffee House Shots. I'm James Hill and I'm

0:32.7

joined today by Tim Shipman, Spectator's political editor and Tom Ballwin, the Prime Minister's

0:36.4

biographer. Now Tim, in this week's magazine, you've written about the sentence in Labor that maybe it's time to sort of tack left. There's a bit of a bribe with the sort of greens going up in the polls, and perhaps the current strategy isn't working. Can you talk us through the thinking on this? Well, look, I think if you look at the budget, if you put aside the sort of boilerplate view on the day that Rachel Reeves was just placating her back benches, and there was undeniably some elements of that in what they chose to do, there is actually a sort of logical position of attacking to the left, at least on the economy, if you look at the numbers.

1:07.2

And what the polls show is that since the turn of the year, Labor's lost about 15%

1:12.5

of its 2024 vote to the right to reform, and that's remained pretty steady throughout the year.

1:17.8

And if you look at the figures for the number of voters who are going to the left, it is increasing.

1:23.7

It was about 15% at the start of the year. It's now 25% or more, if you look at the most

1:28.5

recent polls. And that has accelerated since Zach Polanski took over the Green Party. So on the

1:34.2

face of it, they're losing more votes to the left and to the right. Now, the votes to the right

1:38.1

are proportionately more important because they're in more seats. And we had some figures in the

1:42.8

magazine this week showing that that's probably, if those numbers were replicated at the general election that

1:48.8

Labour would lose pushing 200 seats to reform on the right and they'd lose about 170 to the left

1:54.9

with those levels of voter bleed but if you also look at what voters who are stuck with Labor might do, the number that

2:03.4

are still sticking around but might go to the reform is very, very much smaller, less than half

2:08.0

the number who might still be prepared to vote for Greens or the lip-dem. So the downside risk is

2:13.3

there as well. And there's a sort of logic to, particularly on the economy and on environmental

2:19.3

stuff, to go and appeal to those voters who are appealing away on the left. And a lot of what

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 20 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.