Subscribe to The Spectator and get 12 weeks of Britain's most incisive politics coverage,

unrivaled books and arts reviews, and so much more, all for just £12.

Not only that, but we'll also send you a £20 Amazon gift card absolutely free.

As a subscriber, you'll also be able to listen to all our other podcasts, ad-free.

Go to www.w.com.com.com.com

u.com.com. Voucher to claim this offer now. Terms apply.

Hello, welcome to the special Saturday edition of Coffee House Shots. I'm James Hill. I'm Joyita-Torne Miller, the MP for Bista, and Annabald Danham, who is the senior political commentator at The Daily Telegraph. Now, Annabelle, last week you wrote a piece asking what exactly is the point of the Lib Dems. Do you want to give us your take fully aware here that Callum opposite is the foreign affairs spokesman for the Lib Dems.

To be clear, when I wrote the piece, I didn't know that I would subsequently be taking part in a spectator TV discussion with a Liberal Democrat. But no, I think, you know, I was prompted

to write this by Ed Davies, very strong rhetoric around the US extraction of Nicola's Maduro and how that seemed to be a way,

perhaps, if you were being cynical, for the lived ems to set themselves apart from the other

political parties. And I suppose the two questions I wanted to drill down into in my piece were, first, should the Liberal Democrats be doing better than they are?

And there's a new poll this week, which has shown they are on around 12% and the Greens have caught up with them.

So why is it that when there is such a sense of disillusionment with Labour and the

Tories that Libidems aren't performing better? And second, what is it that the modern

Liberal Democrat Party stands for? Because to paraphrase Voltaire talking about the Holy Roman Empire,

they don't seem to me to be particularly

liberal or particularly democratic when you look at their stance on Brexit. And that really was

the thrust of the piece and what I was looking at. Calam your response to that. Well, I welcome the

chance to have a right of reply. So thank you very much for offering that. Why don't we start where Annabel did with Venezuela? So the way I would think about that is actually that

the other parties in British politics have moved away from what would have been a consensual

position really not very long ago. So I don't see this as some kind of strident attempt by the

Lib Dems differentiate ourselves. Rather, we are holding to principles of international law,

...