meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

Coffee House Shots: The politics of toppling a statue

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 8 June 2020

⏱️ 18 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Thousands of protesters took to the streets this weekend as part of the Black Lives Matter movement. In Bristol, a statue of the slaver Edward Colston was toppled and thrown into the city's docks. But are we now seeing a change in the government's response? Katy Balls speaks to Fraser Nelson and James Forsyth.

Get a subscription to The Spectator as well as a copy of Lionel Shriver's book, all for free here.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Spectator magazine combines incisive political commentary with books and arts reviews of unrivaled authority.

0:07.4

Stock up on your summer reading with a 12-week subscription, in print and online for just £12.

0:13.9

Plus, we'll send you a copy of Spectator columnist Lionel Shriver's new book,

0:18.7

The Motion of the Body Through Space, Absolutely Free. Go to

0:23.0

spectator.com.uk forward slash Lionel.

0:30.0

Hello and welcome to Coffee House Shots, Spectator's Daily Politics Podcast. I'm Katie Balls

0:35.9

and I'm joined by James F Forsythe and Fraser Nelson.

0:39.0

This weekend we saw thousands of protesters take to the streets across the UK for the Black Lives

0:44.2

Matters movement. However, there were a number of incidents which have led the news. Boris Johnson

0:49.8

has intervened on Sunday night he called out the thuggery, which he said had changed the nature

0:55.3

of a protest, even though it was by a few. Pretty Patel, the Home Secretary, has also criticised

1:01.1

some of the protesters, particularly in response to a statue of Edward Colston being pulled down

1:06.5

in Bristol, the slave owner. James, are we seeing a change in response from the government

1:12.7

in terms of how it is treating these protests? Because last week at least, there was a big effort

1:17.6

to say they understood why people would want to protest, but anything would have to be done

1:22.5

in a socially distanced manner, which it's proved as quite hard to do. Yes. I think the government initially

1:28.7

his desire was just to kind of emphasize that people should comply with social distancing

1:33.6

or they shouldn't go to large gatherings. I think they felt that saying that they were sympathetic

1:38.6

to what the protesters were saying was the kind of most effective way of getting that

1:43.1

message over. I think obviously some of the

1:47.1

violence that happened at the weekend forces the government to issue a response. Now, I mean, let's take

1:52.1

the statute of Edward Colson in Bristol. I think there is obviously a debate about the statute,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.