meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Centre for European Reform podcast

CER podcast series: The economics of populism, episode three

Centre for European Reform podcast

Centre for European Reform

News

4.853 Ratings

🗓️ 30 November 2016

⏱️ 10 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this episode, Martin Hellwig and Agnès Bénassy-Quéré discuss ‘Has trade liberalisation and financial globalisation gone too far?’ In November 2016, the CER took more than 50 of Europe's top economists to Ditchley Park in Oxfordshire for a conference on 'The economics of populism’. This CER podcast series offers an insight into the discussions of that weekend.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome. My name is Sophia Besh and you're listening to the CER podcast.

0:11.0

Hello and welcome to the third episode of the CER podcast series on the economics of populism. My name's John Springford. I'm Director of Research at the Centre for

0:21.8

European Reform. And today I'm in conversation with Agnes Bensi Kere and Martin Helwig. Anas is

0:30.9

a professor at the Paris School of Economics and she's chairperson of the French Council of Economic

0:36.8

Analysis. And Martin is director of the French Council of Economic Analysis.

0:43.2

And Martin is director of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods and a professor of economics at the University of Bonn.

0:47.9

So an incredibly difficult conversation, which we've just had a session which lasted about an hour and a half discussing.

0:54.8

The question is, has trade liberalisation and financial globalization gone too far?

0:59.6

I'd like each of you to try and answer that question in 60 seconds, if you possibly can.

1:04.2

Martin, do you want to go first?

1:07.1

Well, as I mentioned in this session, the question is really, what's the normative standard

1:15.6

that's implicitly assumed?

1:17.6

What's the objective? What are the constraints?

1:20.6

If we think about the objective as simply being efficiency, the answer is it can never go too far, but then we're just the elitist

1:30.3

intellectuals who are part of the overall problem. We need to see first that efficiency

1:38.0

is not the same as welfare, that distribution matters. We need to see second that

1:46.1

if you go too

1:47.9

far in one direction,

1:50.0

the strategies may

1:52.2

become politically unviable.

1:54.2

And we also need to see that the people

1:55.9

who make them unviable

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Centre for European Reform, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Centre for European Reform and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.