One-11-1-70-2.

You're trying to be a street cop.

You guys, welcome to this episode of the Street Cop Trading podcast.

Your host, founder and CEO of Street Cop Trading.

My name is Dennis Benito, and today we have a case law short, and it's sponsored by, yes, you guessed it.

Lady LawShield.com.

Bridges-Triczillo is one of the best in the business. Wrongful termination. case law short and it's sponsored by yes you guessed it lady law shield dot com bridges

trachillo is one of the best in the business wrongful termination workplace harassment don't

let these people do these things to you reach out to her she's really good she was one of us

she used to be a police officer that's why she went into law to help all of you make sure that you

are treated fairly at work and it's not some pokey, pokey, hippie-dippy stuff.

She really is very good at what she does.

I always enjoy having her other podcast.

Check her out at ladylawshield.com.

She is the sponsor of this case law short.

And today we're going to talk about a very important case called United States v. Wang Sung.

And what it talked about in 1963, it addressed the scope of the fruit of the poisonous tree

doctrine. That's where this word comes from, which excludes evidence obtained through

unconstitutional actions by law enforcement. Now, just don't forget, when we see unconstitutional

actions by law enforcement, it doesn't even have to be intentional. It just has to be, this is the

rules. You didn't follow them. Hence why case law is so important to know. This case analyzed whether

statements and evidence obtained after an unlawful arrest could still be used in court. So here's

...