Case in Point: Passports and the Single Girl – Or Maybe Not!
The Ricochet Superfeed
Ricochet
4.4 • 651 Ratings
🗓️ 13 November 2025
⏱️ 21 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Right is still right, even if you stand by yourself. |
| 0:04.7 | Mr. Chief Justice, may it place the court. |
| 0:08.1 | Hans Hans Pasky or Mr. A.C. Point. |
| 0:11.2 | The title of our episode today is Passports and the Single Girl, or maybe not. |
| 0:17.6 | Now, that title is a riff on a 1964 movie starring Tony Curtis and Natalie Wood called Sex and the |
| 0:24.4 | Single Girl. But today, I guess it might be sex and the guy who thinks he's a single girl. There is a |
| 0:32.3 | passport dispute going on between the Trump administration, the ACLU, and a number of other plaintiffs, |
| 0:39.5 | over the issuance of passports by the U.S. State Department. |
| 0:45.0 | This reached the Supreme Court on November 6th when they stayed or suspended |
| 0:50.5 | an injunction had been issued by a lower court, a federal district court judge in |
| 0:57.6 | Massachusetts named Julia Kobach, who no surprise is a Biden appointee. She issued a preliminary |
| 1:06.0 | injunction telling the Trump administration, specifically the State Department, that they could not require |
| 1:12.8 | anyone applying for a passport to list, if you can believe this, their biological sex on the |
| 1:19.5 | passport. No, really, that's what a federal judge, former clerk for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, |
| 1:25.4 | told the government. Now, unfortunately, this injunction, which I consider to be pretty bizarre, |
| 1:33.3 | was upheld by the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. |
| 1:37.3 | So the government really didn't have any choice other than to try to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, |
| 1:43.3 | and the U.S. Supreme Court did issue a injunction |
| 1:46.9 | temporarily for this measure. Now, to talk about this, oh, I'm sorry, I should say, the Supreme Court, |
| 1:54.6 | in issuing the stay or suspension, said. Requiring passport holders to list their sex at birth, no more offends |
| 2:10.2 | equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth. In both cases, the government |
| 2:15.4 | is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ricochet, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Ricochet and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

