Hey folks, I'm Pete Barara.

And I'm Joyce Vance.

This week we have a busy docket on the Cafe Insider podcast, a panel of 11 circuit judges

and to the special master review of the Mar-a-Lago documents.

The court's opinion is very clear.

It says, if someone who hasn't yet been indicted is going to try and circumvent a criminal

investigation, then they have to show that there's been callous disregard for their constitutional

rights.

We said in no uncertain terms that there's nothing special about Donald Trump's status

as the former president of the United States, right?

And that was one of the arguments that was made by his lawyers that it's an extraordinary

thing to execute a search warrant on a former president.

And therefore, this extraordinary remedy must be permitted.

A jury convicted Oathkeeper's leader Stuart Rhodes on a seditious conspiracy charge for

his involvement in the January 6 attack at the Capitol.

This is a highly unusual charge.

And when it's brought in recent times, it's tended to fail.

Big deal or not?

You know, it's a really big deal.

The statute is rarely used because, frankly, we are not a country where seditious conspiracy

takes place every day.

But this was a case that just cried out to be indicted under the seditious conspiracy

...