I'm Chandley Painter and this is the Fox True Crime podcast.

The murder trial of Brian Walsh began earlier this week with shocking online search history entries taking center stage.

The 50-year-old Walsh is accused of killing his wife,

Anna, dismembering and hiding her body in 2023. Massachusetts State Trooper and Digital Forensic

Expert Nicholas Guarino took the stand, providing his analysis of Walsh's alleged Google search

history, which included the phrase,

Best Way to Dispose of Body Parts After Murder. Walsh has pleaded guilty to two of the three

charges against him, misleading police and unlawful conveyance of human remains. However, he still

maintains his innocence for the charge of first-degree

murder. Former NYPD inspector, attorney, and Fox News contributor, Paul Morrow, has covered the case

on his new Fox Nation show, The Weekly RAP sheet. He joins me now with his legal analysis.

Paul, how do you think the trial is going so far?

Well, if you're the prosecution, this is one of those ones where it almost can't go badly because the facts are so compelling. I mean, the only thing they're missing here, obviously,

is a body. But what people labor under the delusion of is that you absolutely have to have a body

for a murder conviction there are at this point it was a relatively new thing at one point but

at this point there are a legion of cases some of them high profile where you got a conviction

without a body and clearly it's one of the things that was on walsh's mind because Walsh himself Googled, according to the reporting, do you get convicted of murder without having a body or words to that effect?

So I would argue that at this point, it's a case that the prosecution realistically just has to be careful not to botch up, not to make an

unforced error. Let the evidence speak for itself because unless the jury is really credulous,

it seems like according to opening statements that Walsh is going to go with a defense of some sort

of sudden death that occurred to her that is undetermined and that he couldn't determine.

Of course, we can't determine it.

...