4.8 • 12.9K Ratings
🗓️ 12 April 2023
⏱️ 24 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | I'm Ben Myceles from the Midas Touch Network Manhattan District Attorney. Alvin Bragg has filed a |
0:07.0 | federal lawsuit against Maga Republican Jim Jordan as well as the Maga Republican controlled |
0:15.4 | committee on the judiciary of the United States of the House of Representatives. This is a 50-page |
0:22.6 | federal lawsuit filed by the Manhattan District Attorney's office in the district court in Manhattan, |
0:29.2 | which is the Southern District of New York. This lawsuit is seeking injunctive relief to block |
0:37.6 | Jim Jordan and to block the Judiciary Committee from further engaging in interference with the |
0:45.0 | Manhattan District Attorney's Criminal Prosecution of Donald Trump and more specifically the key issue |
0:53.4 | where there is kind of an imminent conclusion that is needed is that the Maga Republicans in the |
1:00.1 | Judiciary Committee have subpoenaed Mark Pomeran's who is the former special assistant district |
1:08.2 | attorney who was working under the former district attorney Sy Vance and who resigned under the |
1:15.0 | Manhattan District Attorney, Alvin Bragg's 10-year. The Maga Republicans are seeking to subpoena |
1:22.0 | Mark Pomeran's to get his testimony by April 20th as well as a document production by Mark Pomeran's |
1:31.4 | and here Alvin Bragg is requesting that the district court judge block the Maga Republicans in the |
1:39.0 | House of Representatives like Jim Jordan and others on the Judiciary Committee from interfering with |
1:45.4 | the criminal prosecution of the local state prosecutors at the Manhattan District Attorney's office, |
1:52.6 | which is a violation of basic principles of federalism. You'll see from the complaint it is |
2:00.3 | styled as Alvin Bragg, Jr. versus Jim Jordan and his official capacity as chairman of the committee |
2:07.4 | on the Judiciary as well as the committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of |
2:13.2 | Representatives are both defendants as well as Mark Pomeran's is a defendant and so you may be saying |
2:20.6 | well as Alvin Bragg's suing Mark Pomeran's here well because the House Judiciary Committee subpoenaed |
2:28.2 | Mark Pomeran's for Mark Pomeran's to give testimony Mark Pomeran's is a party of interest in this case |
2:36.0 | who has to be joined he's what's called a necessary and indispensable party so if he was not brought |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from MeidasTouch Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of MeidasTouch Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.