All right, listen, guys, I get it. Many of you are unable to financially support this ministry

because you're spending your cash in your lives on raising young children in the fear and

admonition of the Lord. Praise God for you and that endeavor. However, algorithms are a thing.

Shadow banning, sadly, is a thing. And one major way that you can help to expand the reach and effectiveness

of this ministry that doesn't cost you a dime is by spending just a few moments leaving us a five-star

review. Also, perhaps even more effective than that, you can share our podcast with a friend.

We hope you'll take the time to do so. Thank you so much.

God bless. I wrote something that I want to read. It has to do with whether or not a woman can preach

and of course whether or not a woman should preach. Are those things linked together? Is it merely that a woman

cannot, or I'm sorry, should not preach, but that she could preach, she's just not allowed,

or do these things actually coincide, ability and allowance? So I've written the following.

Complementarianism and Antinnomianism have this in common.

They both subtly assert that God's loving commands, duties, and roles are at least partially

arbitrary by severing the relationship between what God assigns from how God designs.

They malign the character of God, albeit perhaps unintentionally, as capricious. A woman should not preach because she cannot preach. The fact that

many complementarians believe a woman is able, but merely not allowed, reveals a profound misunderstanding within

even conservative churches regarding the nature of men and women and the nature of preaching.

Women nurture and give life. Many, even in the Reformed camp, assume preaching is nothing more than providing spiritual nourishment,

serving a spiritual meal on the Lord's Day.

If so, why can't women do it?

This confusion is compounded by the failures of many male preachers.

Many male pastors today sit on a stool next to a high top table with a warm

...