meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Public Health On Call

Bonus Episode - Mifepristone and EMTALA SCOTUS Rulings: A Holding Pattern

Public Health On Call

The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

News, Health & Fitness, Medicine

4.6 • 644 Ratings

🗓️ 3 July 2024

⏱️ 20 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

About this episode:

The Supreme Court has issued decisions in the two major abortion cases on its docket this year. For the time being, the drug mifepristone remains on the market and a federal law requiring that emergency rooms provide life-saving abortions even in states banning the procedure is upheld. But the court's decisions—both upholding the status quo—all but guarantee both cases will be back, putting mifepristone and EMTALA once again under fire.

Guests:

Joanne Rosen is an expert in public health law and a co-director of the Center for Law and the Public's Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Host:

Dr. Josh Sharfstein is vice dean for public health practice and community engagement at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, a faculty member in health policy, a pediatrician, and former secretary of Maryland's Health Department.

Show links and related content:

Contact us:

Have a question about something you heard? Want to suggest a topic or guest? Contact us via email or visit our website.

Follow us:

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Public Health On Call, a podcast from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,

0:05.9

where we bring evidence, experience, and perspective to make sense of today's leading health challenges.

0:16.3

If you have questions or ideas for us, please send an email to public health question at jh.

0:21.6

Jh.edu.

0:23.6

That's public health question at jh.u.edu for future podcast episodes.

0:29.6

This is Lindsay Smith Rogers.

0:33.6

It's been widely noted that pulse oxymeters, devices used to read blood oxygen levels

0:39.4

in hospitals and at home, are far less reliable for people of color and especially darker

0:44.4

skinned patients than for white patients. The error results in readings that are falsely normal,

0:50.4

creating the potential for clinical staff to miss life-threatening complications.

0:55.0

On Monday, July 8th, we're launching a special three-episode series,

1:00.0

that's all three episodes available at once, exploring the issue of racial bias in pulse oxymeters.

1:07.0

We'll look at why this long-standing problem only caught the nation's attention in recent years,

1:11.6

despite the fact that there were known issues that were largely ignored by manufacturers and regulators.

1:17.6

We'll also dive into the history that led us to the flawed devices that are used in hospitals everywhere and available for consumers on the market today.

1:25.6

Finally, we'll hear from advocates from across the medical spectrum,

1:30.1

including patients, clinicians, students, and scholars,

1:33.9

about where we go from here to demand equity

1:36.6

and ensure that it's built into the future of medicine.

1:39.9

Look for this special series on Monday, July 8th,

1:42.8

wherever you get your podcasts, or go to

1:45.3

publichealth.j.j.u.edu slash podcast. Today, making sense of the Supreme Court's

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.