The following podcast contains advertising.

To access an ad-free version of the LawFair podcast,

become a material supporter of LawFair at patreon.com slash law fair.

That's patreon.com slash law fair.

Also, check out LawFair's other podcast offerings,

rational security, chatter, law fair no bull, and the aftermath.

I think the White House Council really does benefit enormously from an acceptance of his or her role

and a process-process-mindedness that supports the council in doing his or her job.

The White House Council cannot operate in a White House in which there are endless factions

quarreling with each other, some may be aligned with the White House Council,

some may be suspicious of the White House Council, and no predictable procedure

for the raising and addressing of legal issues.

Now, for all I know, that situation has changed since the Chief of Staff's decision to change,

since the Chief of Person holding that office changed,

but I can't imagine from the client to the parent-wild-western kind of character

of the deliberative process that we understand to be the case in this current White House,

I would imagine it would be a very, very difficult job for the White House Council to do.

I'm Vanessa Sondor, and this is the LawFair podcast October 7th, 2017.

Last month, LawFair and Foreign Policy hosted an event unlawyering for the Trump presidency.

Susan Hennessey spoke with former White House Council's Bob Bauer,

who served in the Obama administration from 2010 to 2011,

in AB Colby House, who served in the Reagan administration from 1987 to 1989,

...