Ready to launch your business? Get started with the commerce platform made for entrepreneurs.

Shopify is specially designed to help you start, run and grow your business with easy customizable themes that let you build your brand.

Marketing tools that get your products out there. Integrated shipping solutions that actually save you time.

From startups to scaleups, online, in person, and on the go. Shopify is made for

entrepreneurs like you. Sign up for your $1 a month trial at Shopify.com slash setup.

From CNN, I'm a FOMADK, with the five things you need to know for Thursday, May 15th.

The Supreme Court heard more than two hours of arguments today over President Donald

Trump's move to end birthright citizenship. And justices seemed open to lifting a series of

nationwide orders, blocking the administration's policy, even as several justices wrestled with the practical

implications of allowing the government to deny citizenship to some people born in the U.S.

The main question for the justices was whether lower courts went too far by blocking Trump's

executive order nationwide. Five of the six conservative justices seem open to backing the president

on that, but didn't seem ready to endorse a departure from the longstanding precedent upholding

birthright citizenship. Liberal justices battered Solicitor General D. John Sauer with questions

on how rolling back nationwide injunctions would work.

And Justice Katanji Brown-Jackson pressed Sauer on whether a universal injunction in the case

could lead to requiring every individual to file their own lawsuit.

The real concern, I think, is that your argument seems to turn our justice system, in my view at least,

into a catch-me-if-you-can kind of regime

from the standpoint of the executive, where everybody has to have a lawyer and file a lawsuit

in order for the government to stop violating people's rights. I think the catch-me-if-you-can

problem operates in the opposite direction where we have the government

...