meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
1 big thing

Big Tech’s Big Tobacco moment

1 big thing

Axios

News

4.02K Ratings

🗓️ 12 October 2021

⏱️ 10 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Senators at Facebook’s hearing last week used an analogy we’ve heard before -- that Big Tech is having its Big Tobacco moment. But: It took decades to enact meaningful regulations with Big Tobacco, and we could see the same happen with tech companies. Plus, the challenges of permanent housing for Afghan refugees. And, the abysmal rate of female biographies on Wikipedia. Guests: Axios' Ina Fried and Linh Ta and Women in Red founder Roger Bamkin. Credits: Axios Today is produced in partnership with Pushkin Industries. The team includes Niala Boodhoo, Sara Kehaulani Goo, Dan Bobkoff, Alexandra Botti, Nuria Marquez Martinez, Sabeena Singhani, Alex Sugiura, Lydia McMullen Laird, and David Toledo. Music is composed by Evan Viola. You can reach us at podcasts@axios.com. You can text questions, comments and story ideas to Niala as a text or voice memo to 202-918-4893. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Good morning. Welcome to Axios today. It's Tuesday, October 12th. I'm Nyla Boudou. Here's

0:09.6

what you need to know today. The challenge is a permanent housing for Afghan refugees,

0:14.2

plus the abysmal rate of female biographies on Wikipedia. But first, Big Tech's Big

0:20.3

Tobacco Moment is today's one big thing. Senators at the Facebook hearing last week

0:29.5

used an analogy we've heard before. The Big Tech is having its Big Tobacco Moment. Well,

0:35.1

it took decades to put real regulations on Big Tobacco, and Axios' technology correspondent

0:40.2

Inafreed is here to tell us what could be next for Big Tech companies. Hey, Nyla. Let's

0:45.8

first start with, is this a fair comparison? Why are people making this? I think it's a somewhat

0:51.2

fair comparison. I think it's not totally apt. It's fair in the sense that, you know, you're

0:56.4

talking about a product that's widely used that also has some harms that are reasonably

1:03.6

well understood, but that the companies have researched and known, but tried to hide.

1:09.4

I think one of the things that's super important to keep in mind is when you talk about tobacco,

1:14.6

and when you were talking about companies that were largely producing the same thing, and

1:18.4

then they didn't change a whole lot over time either. So it was a pretty static target

1:23.3

to go after, and even still it took decades to go from understanding that cigarettes were

1:28.6

harmful to meaningful change through regulation and litigation and legislation.

1:35.3

What other challenges do you think there are in terms of quantifying the effect of social

1:40.6

media in terms of just gathering data about this?

1:43.7

Well, again, you know, it was hard even in the tobacco days to say, yes, you know, this

1:48.2

person got lung cancer. They probably got it from smoking, but how do you prove it? It's

1:52.7

much tougher when we're talking about technology, because how do you say that someone was radicalized

1:58.8

by social media? Or, you know, how do you quantify the harms of anti-vaccine or COVID misinformation?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Axios, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Axios and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.