Beyond Impeachment, What About *Criminal* Liability
Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast
WNYC Studios
4.4 • 675 Ratings
🗓️ 13 January 2021
⏱️ 21 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | I'm Brian Lehrer. This is my daily politics podcast from WNYC Studios. It's Wednesday, January 13th. |
| 0:15.0 | With me now on some of the legal aspects of impeachment, as well as the investigation and prosecution of some of the rioters |
| 0:21.9 | themselves, is Cardoza Law School Professor Jessica Roth. She is co-director of the Jacob Burns |
| 0:29.0 | Center for Ethics in the Practice of Law, and previously she was a federal prosecutor in the U.S. |
| 0:35.1 | Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York here in Manhattan |
| 0:38.8 | for seven years. Professor Roth, thank you so much for joining us on this momentous day. |
| 0:44.6 | It's my pleasure to join you. Thank you. So people are saying if Trump is not convicted in the |
| 0:49.5 | Senate of this charge of incitement to insurrection, he could potentially be charged with it in court |
| 0:55.6 | criminally. Could you describe as a law professor what incitement to insurrection or to riot |
| 1:01.0 | is in legal terms and what a prosecutor would need to prove to a jury to get a conviction on that? |
| 1:07.8 | So I think the most important thing to bear in mind is to pass First Amendment scrutiny, |
| 1:13.6 | a prosecutor would have to prove that the defendant, whether it's the President of the United |
| 1:20.2 | States or anyone else, engaged in speech and conduct that was both directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, |
| 1:30.5 | and also was in fact likely to incite or produce such action. And that's pursuant to Supreme |
| 1:37.4 | Court precedent. And so that's thinking about both the intent of the speaker and also the sort of objective reality, the |
| 1:47.3 | context in terms of was it actually likely given the words and the overall context to actually |
| 1:55.6 | incite or produce imminent lawless action. So that imminency is what's really quite critical. So let me play a |
| 2:03.4 | couple of clips that in this theoretical trial could become pieces of evidence and get your take |
| 2:10.8 | as to whether they rise to that standard that you just described of willful incitement to riot. |
| 2:21.2 | I want to go back to September 23rd. So this is during the campaign. This is just a seven-second clip. So listeners, pay attention. This will go by |
| 2:26.8 | in a flash with a quick reporter's question and a quick response from Trump. |
| 2:32.3 | Will you commit to making sure that there is a peaceful transferal of power after the election? |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from WNYC Studios, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of WNYC Studios and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

