This is ridiculous. This is a slam dunk example of BBC bias and a BBC's failure to do journalism,

to tell you what's actually going on in the world. Let's just listen to this clip from BBC Breakfast.

It's from this morning. It's discussing Donald Trump, the United States and Greenland.

Good morning, six o'clock. Welcome to Breakfast with Sally Nugent and John Kay.

Our headlines for you today. Using the American military to acquire Greenland,

the White House says it's one of the options President Trump and his team are discussing.

Let me just read that back. Let's just read back what was said.

Using the American military to acquire Greenland. The White House says it's one of the options Trump and his team are discussing.

If you're wondering what that noise is, it's a howl of pain emanating from the grave of George Orwell.

Using the American military to acquire Greenland.

Acquire.

Is there any other word in English language that might be,

I don't know, maybe a bit more appropriate. I mean, there are, after all, around 170,000 words

in current use in English. It's not like there's a lack of options here. A little thought

experiment for you. Imagine a story was about Russia talking about Latvia? Would the BBC say, using the Russian military

to acquire Latvia? Can you imagine? Do any of you think of one moment that would happen?

Now, we all know what they would say. They would correctly say, by the way, that Russia is

threatening to invade Latvia and annex it. That's what they'd say. They would foreground

the fact that this

would be an act of armed aggression and illegal act of armed aggression at that. Note the text as well.

They're using on their on-screen banner, US Greenland plans. Euphemistic doesn't even begin to

describe it. They're talking about it like, I don't know, government plans for transport or education.

...