meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Baby Ninth Amendments: How Americans Embraced Unenumerated Rights and Why It Matters

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 9 May 2023

⏱️ 24 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Anthony Sanders is author of the new book, Baby Ninth Amendments: How Americans Embraced Unenumerated Rights and Why It Matters.

You can watch a replay our book forum for Baby Ninth Amendments here.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Kater Daily Podcast for Tuesday, May 9th,

0:05.8

2023.

0:07.1

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:08.1

The Ninth Amendment in the U.S. Bill of Rights doesn't get much respect,

0:11.8

even though it's clearly there for a reason to protect rights

0:14.2

that would be effectively impossible to enumerate.

0:17.6

Many states have their own so-called baby ninth amendments.

0:21.1

Anthony Sanders is author of the new book, Baby Ninth Amendments, how Americans

0:24.8

embraced unenumerated rights and why it matters.

0:28.8

We spoke last week.

0:30.4

You spent a lot of time talking about baby ninth amendments.

0:34.0

These are amendments that exist within state

0:39.0

constitutions in many states, but before we get to that, I feel like there's some prologue we have to get

0:45.1

into which is the Ninth Amendment itself in the Bill of Rights. What does it protect Anthony?

0:54.0

Well that's a huge question, Caleb, that I thankfully don't delve into much in the book.

1:03.0

But I'll give you my opinion anyways,

1:05.0

which is that the Ninth Amendment protects rights

1:08.0

beyond just those enumerated in the Constitution.

1:12.0

And it says, the enumeration in the enumeration of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or

1:18.0

disparage others retained by the people. Now there's a huge debate as to what this means. The justices over the years

1:26.0

on the US Supreme Court have been afraid of it frankly and so it's come up from time to time

1:31.1

but not really there's no authoritative ruling on it other than that we don't think it really does anything and so

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.