Australia’s migration policy and disability discrimination
Marketplace All-in-One
Marketplace
4.5 • 1.4K Ratings
🗓️ 12 July 2024
⏱️ 7 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Australia is sometimes called a “migration nation,” as a third of its population was born abroad. That said, people with disabilities are often not welcome. Many foreigners with disabilities or serious medical conditions are routinely denied an Australian visa. But there’s pressure for policy change. Also on the show: A three-judge panel has concluded that many U.S. college athletes are likely employees and may be protected under federal minimum wage laws.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Are some college athletes employees with a right to employee pay? |
| 0:05.0 | I'm David Brancaccio. A federal court has called into question another piece of the |
| 0:10.6 | college sports model a three-judge panel has concluded that many |
| 0:14.4 | college athletes are likely employees not amateur students and may be |
| 0:19.7 | protected under federal minimum wage laws marketplaces's Novosophos here with more. |
| 0:25.6 | Yeah, David, they're chipping away at that model. |
| 0:27.5 | This case is between current and former National Collegiate Athletic Association |
| 0:31.4 | Division I athletes and participating universities and |
| 0:35.1 | the NCAA itself. If this ruling stands it would move forward a 2021 Supreme Court |
| 0:40.7 | decision that college athletes can profit from their name, image, and |
| 0:43.9 | likeness. That was about sharing in the spoils of celebrity. Now a panel of the |
| 0:48.9 | Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, which cited that Supreme Court decision, has ruled that collegiate athletes |
| 0:55.4 | deserve scrutiny as to whether the way they participate in school sports programs crosses |
| 1:00.9 | a threshold into employee status. The key issue being how much does the |
| 1:05.5 | school control the students activities. What practical effect is this ruling |
| 1:11.3 | have now? Well none right away the appeals court panel sent |
| 1:16.0 | the case back to the lower court to figure out a test to determine which student |
| 1:19.9 | athletes would qualify as employees and which wouldn't. |
| 1:22.5 | Presumably that the determination itself can be challenged down the road, |
| 1:26.4 | but the NCAA's position is that this appeals court ruling decision |
| 1:29.7 | has already gone too far and that it could hurt women's sports, Olympic sports and |
| 1:34.0 | sports at HBCUs, but the appeals court said why shouldn't participating |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Marketplace, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Marketplace and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

