I'm 2008, Dell. I left my group practice and started integrative pediatrics and about

a thousand patients joined me. We grew that practice to over 15,000 active patients over

a matter of just a few years. And it was in around the time, oh 2016, I wrote the vaccine

friendly plan. That's when I created the data set that became the publication published

in a peer review journal, this Vax Unvax study that's based on real world data of over

3,000 patients, all every single patient born into my practice from the day I opened my

door to the day we closed this data set was included. No exclusions like you see done

by the pharma studies that really cherry pick who they're going to look at. This is every

single patient born into the practice. I was a pro vaccine doctor trained mainstream.

And when I started hearing patients telling me and I started seeing it for myself, all

these medical chronic conditions that are clearly more prevalent in the highly vaccinated,

I thought, wow, how do we ever get the world to see what I'm seeing? And what we did

to really make sure we were comparing apples to apples was there were 500 and some unvaccinated

no vaccines at all. We age matched those 500 to 500 vaccinated kids. Now realize these

are variably vaccinated. They're not CDC schedule vaccinated kids. Actually, some wise

person it might have been you I forget who said why don't you do a quality assurance

analysis of your data. I thought, yeah, why don't I? I mean, in medicine, if you do an

intervention like any change to what's normally being done, a really ethical thing to do

is to look at the outcome of that intervention. So that's what we did on November 23rd, 2020.

We published this study in a peer review journal in Dell. It was rigorously peer reviewed.

It took months to get it through that process. But the data that you shared, it's there.

It's powerful. Even in the lighter vaccine schedule, you see this dramatic difference in

...