4.6 • 787 Ratings
🗓️ 22 December 2020
⏱️ 82 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Data scientist David Shor discusses some of the bad choices made by Democratic political campaigns. What's the cause of the errors? Is it irrationality, coordination problems, or something else?
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Today's episode of Rationally Speaking is brought to you by Givewell. Charities vary widely in how effective they are, and it's hard for a donor to tell the difference. Givewell spends thousands of hours each year researching which charities do the most good with your money. Visit givewell.org slash rationally speaking to get a short list of the charities they have found with the best evidence behind them. |
0:22.9 | The recommendations are free to use and Givewell does not take a cut of your donation. |
0:27.7 | Also, if you're a first-time donor, your donation will be matched up to $250. |
0:32.8 | Donate now through givewell.org slash rationally speaking. |
0:52.8 | Thank you. through givewell.org slash rationally speaking. Welcome to Rationally Speaking, the podcast where we explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense. |
0:59.6 | Today's guest is David Shore. He's a political data scientist who got his start doing analysis for the Obama campaign when he was only 20, and now does consulting for various progressive groups. I've become a big fan of |
1:13.0 | David's really insightful, evidence-based discussions of political polling and strategy, |
1:18.6 | so I reached out to him to get his thoughts on a question I'm interested in, which is |
1:23.9 | whether politicians are being rational about how to win elections. |
1:30.0 | Because, you know, I suspect, like a lot of you, I often look at politics and think, you know, |
1:36.6 | why did you choose to focus on that issue? Why did you frame your message that way? |
1:41.4 | Why did you choose to run that candidate? That seems like such a bad |
1:44.8 | call. And I wanted the take of a thoughtful insider about whether there really are good reasons |
1:50.8 | that I'm not seeing for the choices that might seem to me to be unforced errors. So that's basically |
1:58.4 | what David Shore and I talk about. We focus mostly on the Democrats in the US because that's what he has the most experience |
2:05.6 | with. |
2:06.6 | But I think a lot of the dynamics he talks about are more broadly applicable to politics and just |
2:11.6 | human psychology in general. |
2:13.6 | So here is my conversation with David Shore. |
2:31.2 | So, David, one thing I'm very interested in that I would love to hear your thoughts on is whether politicians and voters are more or less behaving rationally. |
2:34.5 | That is, like, whether their choices make sense, given their goals. |
2:39.9 | And, you know, I've read and listened to a lot of your discussion of political campaigning. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New York City Skeptics, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of New York City Skeptics and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.