meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Rationally Speaking Podcast

The case for racial colorblindness (Coleman Hughes)

Rationally Speaking Podcast

New York City Skeptics

Society & Culture, Skepticism, Science, Philosophy

4.6787 Ratings

🗓️ 5 January 2021

⏱️ 70 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Coleman Hughes explains why he favors a "colorblind" ideal and why the "race-conscious" camp disagrees with him. Coleman and Julia also discuss whether reparations are just, and what counts as racism.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This episode of Rationally Speaking is brought to you by Givewell, the nonprofit that searches for evidence-based charities where your donation can do the most good.

0:10.7

In 2020, podcast listeners like you gave over $1.6 million to Givewell recommended charities, preventing tens of thousands of cases of disease and hundreds of deaths.

0:21.1

In 2021, Givewell is encouraging you to keep the giving spirit alive.

0:24.9

Any listener who starts a new monthly donation by the end of February

0:28.2

will have their first month matched up to $250.

0:32.3

Just go to givewell.org slash rationally speaking,

0:36.2

choose to give monthly, and then when you're checking out, pick

0:39.5

podcast and rationally speaking at checkout. I really have a lot of respect for Givewell's commitment

0:45.3

to rigor and transparency in figuring out how to do the most good possible. Please

0:50.8

check them out at givewell.org slash rationally speaking.

1:17.1

Welcome to Rationally Speaking, the podcast where we explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense.

1:22.2

I'm your host, Julia Galeif, and today's episode features Coleman Hughes.

1:29.1

Coleman is a young rising star who just graduated from college this past May, but he's already a well-established public intellectual, writing about topics such as race and social justice. He's a fellow at the

1:34.7

Manhattan Institute and writes for publications like The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal,

1:38.9

and City Journal, and has his own podcast, Conversations with Coleman. So as you may have noticed, I don't talk a lot about race and social justice on this podcast or online,

1:50.5

and that's mainly because I feel like these conversations usually produce, let's say, lots of heat and not much light.

1:59.4

But I consider Coleman to be definitely an exception

2:02.3

to that rule. And I felt like our conversation really was interesting and helped clarify my

2:08.2

thinking about some issues that have been on my mind in this area, such as how to decide what

2:13.9

counts as racist, or why people disagree about whether the colorblind approach to race

2:20.3

is a good ideal or not. So I really enjoyed our conversation. I found it refreshingly

2:26.3

nuanced and, as I said, clarifying. And I hope you'll agree. So here is my conversation

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New York City Skeptics, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of New York City Skeptics and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.