meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Gray Area with Sean Illing

An “uncomfortable” conversation with Cory Booker

The Gray Area with Sean Illing

Vox Media Podcast Network

Politics, News, News Commentary, Philosophy, Society & Culture

4.511.1K Ratings

🗓️ 13 January 2020

⏱️ 89 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

There is a moral radicalism to the way Cory Booker lives out his politics. He lived for years in a housing project. He leads hunger strikes. He challenges political machines. He’s a vegan. He has a more ambitious policy vision than is often discussed. But beneath that is a far more radical ethical vision than he gets credit for. I think there’s a reason for that. When Booker turns his politics turn outward, they lose clarity. He shies away from drawing bright lines, his answers double back to blur out potential offense. As a result, his arguments for a politics of radical love end up emphasizing his love in ways that obscure his radicalism. As admiring as I am of what Booker demands of himself, I often can’t tell what he’s asking of me. In this conversation, I wanted Booker to risk my discomfort, not just his own. And in his answers, I think you can hear both the remarkable promise and power of Booker’s politics, and some of the challenges that ultimately led him to suspend his campaign. References/Book recommendations: Tightrope by Nicholas Kristof  “Who Killed the Knapp Family” by Nicholas Kristof  The Violence Inside Us by Chris Murphy  My book is available for pre-order! You can find it at www.EzraKlein.com. Want to contact the show? Reach out at ezrakleinshow@vox.com You can subscribe to Ezra's new podcast Impeachment, explained on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, Overcast, Pocket Casts, or your favorite podcast app. Credits: Producer and Editor - Jeff Geld Engineer- Cynthia Gil Researcher - Roge Karma Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

We are not going to solve endemic problems unless people who those problems don't directly affect

0:06.6

begin to understand that we are all in this together.

0:22.5

Hello, welcome to Sir Clanchion, the Fox Media podcast network.

0:26.0

This is a presidential episode, but it is not, I would say, like most of my conversations with

0:31.7

presidential candidates. I've known Senator Cory Booker a long time. You hear that a bit in this

0:37.4

podcast, but my grandfather was close with him back when he was in New York City Councilman.

0:42.4

Just kind of randomly, my grandfather heard him speak at a synagogue once and just really,

0:46.4

really fell for Booker. And so he's been in my political consciousness since before I had what

0:51.4

I would even understand as a political consciousness. And something about Booker and the campaign he's

0:57.3

been running is that there is a deep radicalism to his politics, to his personal politics. People

1:05.5

talk about politics all the time, the positions they hold, the ideas they support, the tweets they

1:11.0

send. But Booker's a guy who he has lived for years in a poor community in New York. So he actually

1:18.8

lives in a community that is suffering from the problems he is trying to fix. He's not separated

1:23.3

himself personally as many, many people do. Most certainly most members of Congress do and mayors do.

1:28.8

He didn't live in the rich part of town. He's personally a vegan. He has gone on long real hunger

1:35.6

strikes. He has lived his politics with an intensity and an authenticity that I find rare. It's

1:42.5

interesting because I don't think Booker has always understood as a most authentic politician,

1:45.5

but oftentimes I think his problem is that he's too authentic. He's authentic in a way that people

1:49.6

can't quite follow him. What he's doing strikes him as an odd or unusual, which is true for people

1:55.2

who come from a deep activist mindset. Booker is interesting in the campaign to me for a lot of

2:01.1

reasons, but one is that there is almost nobody who garners as universally positive reviews for

2:07.9

his debate performances, speeches, etc. But it's failed to catch on more. He's not even qualified

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Vox Media Podcast Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Vox Media Podcast Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.