You're listening to an Airwave Media podcast.

The homes of the future need EV chargers, solar panels and energy-efficient heat pumps.

But at EDF, we're not waiting for the future.

Our teams, rated excellent on Trust Pilot, are installing them all over the UK.

Right now.

PDF. Change is in our power.

In 1932, the Times Literary Supplement published evidence that questions about Shakespeare's authorship had arisen decades earlier than the mid-19th century, when they had previously

been thought to have appeared.

The paper published was from a small 1805 meeting of the Ipswich

Philosophical Society, at which one James Corton Cowell presented the 18th century findings of a clergyman

named James Wilmot, who lived near Stratford upon Avon, and had conducted some research into Shakespeare.

According to this document,

the Reverend Wilmot around 1795 had gone in search of books that belonged to Shakespeare, and had been surprised to not find any in the private libraries of the area. He had been further

unsettled not to find anyone able to offer any clear anecdotes

about the playwright. Perhaps this Wilmot should not have thought it so odd, since he was asking

for anecdotes nearly 180 years after the man's death, and more than 130 years after the last

of his surviving family had passed away.

But regardless, the Reverend apparently found this suspicious enough that he decided the Shakespeare

of Stratford must not have really been the author of the works attributed to him.

And instead, he leapt to the conclusion that it must instead have been Sir Francis Bacon,

who was a true genius and luminary of the same years, and who would certainly have had the knowledge

of court life that it seemed Shakespeare must have had. But Reverend Wilmot was disturbed by his

...