4.8 • 3.3K Ratings
🗓️ 2 November 2017
⏱️ 50 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | If your name was Catherine Will, would you hate Bonfire night? |
| 0:05.0 | Lads of e-list, lads of e-list |
| 0:08.0 | If the earth hasn't moved, am I doing it right? |
| 0:11.0 | Lads of e-list, lads of e-list |
| 0:14.0 | Helen and all the lads of e-list |
| 0:17.0 | It is time to continue our new regular feature |
| 0:20.0 | about Agatha Christie's use of obscure words |
| 0:22.0 | in short stories from the 1930s |
| 0:24.0 | and you will not be disappointed |
| 0:26.0 | because last episode, your recall Helen, |
| 0:29.0 | we all recall |
| 0:30.0 | Cornflower, Miss Marple, Cornflower, Cornflower, Miss Marple |
| 0:33.0 | We discussed the appropriation, miss or otherwise |
| 0:36.0 | in Miss Marple's Tuesday night club |
| 0:38.0 | This episode, it is the turn of Chris, who says |
| 0:41.0 | the case you discussed, centered around the fact that someone |
| 0:44.0 | wouldn't have eaten trifle in the Agatha Christie short story |
| 0:48.0 | because they were dieting |
| 0:49.0 | A vital plot point |
| 0:51.0 | In the story, Christie doesn't use the term dieting |
| 0:54.0 | but instead uses the term banting |
| 0:57.0 | Banting? |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Helen & Olly, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Helen & Olly and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.