There are thousands of decisions in the lower courts that are relied on Chevron.

What happens to them?

One way of on what happens to them.

One way of putting what the court is doing is it's just serving as the vehicle

to deliver those benefits to the billionaires, right? Could be any of the branches of this government.

Right now it's the Supreme Court.

Hi and welcome back to Amicus this is Slate's podcast about the courts and the

law and the Supreme Court I am Dahlia Lythwick and these are the things I cover

at Slate.

As the dust of the Supreme Court's end of term, kind of whirlwind settles, we could probably

do a whole show or even a whole season about any one of the really big cases that came

down in the blur of the last weeks of June.

And we're going to be covering their ramifications for months, if not years to come.

But this week we wanted to circle back to a series of cases that we covered individually,

and these cases taken together are going to represent a kind of soup to nuts overhaul of how industry and commerce are regulated and therefore they're going to represent a soup to nuts of how safe your food, your drugs, your air travel,

your water, your saving and investments, your car really is.

The biggest and highest profile of this clutch of cases was of course the landscape altering

loper bright, the blockbuster that came down in the final days of the term overturning Chevron, which is a 1984 administrative

law decision that has really shaped how American life itself and governance has gotten done for the past 40 years.

But a part of this mix of cases includes Jarkassee and Garland versus Cargill and of course

Corner Post and those case names probably don't

evoke much for you right now but trust me by the end of this episode we hope

...