meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate News

Election Meltdown, Professor Brendan Nyhan

Slate News

Slate Podcasts

News Commentary, Politics, News

4.56K Ratings

🗓️ 26 February 2020

⏱️ 14 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Brendan Nyhan is a political science professor at Dartmouth College who focuses on misinformation and so-called fake news. His views on how fake news affects election outcomes might surprise you. 

Try Slate Plus free: slate.com/amicusplus

Podcast production by Sara Burningham.

Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Dahlia Lithwick. I'm host of this, the Amicus podcast, and co-host with Rick Hassan of our very special election meltdown series, which we've just wrapped. If you enjoyed this series, I want to let you know that there's more of it. We did extended and bonus interviews with Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project,

0:21.9

Professor of Government at Dartmouth, Brendan Nyen, Maine Secretary of State Matt Dunlap,

0:26.9

and Michigan Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson.

0:29.9

I think they really give the fullest scope of all the issues that we have covered in this series,

0:35.9

and all of them are available right now

0:38.4

if you sign up for Slate Plus.

0:40.9

It's only $35 for the first year, and you'll be helping support the work we do here at Amicus

0:46.3

and at Slate.

0:47.7

So head over to slate.com slash amicusplus to sign up now.

0:52.0

You don't want to miss out on these bonus episodes. And And in fact, we have a preview of one of those conversations right here where Brendan Nayan explains why he's more concerned about disinformation that originates within the United States than online influence campaigns coming from overseas.

1:09.6

The 2016 election was notable in a number of respects.

1:13.5

One was the unprecedented volume of misinformation and the role played by social media.

1:20.7

So I want to break that down.

1:23.8

The Russian interference effort was unprecedented in how brazen and open it was and seemed to have succeeded at gaining widespread distribution via Facebook and Twitter to many Americans.

1:40.9

So the Russian bots and trolls and all the different ways that the Russian

1:46.7

government effort tried to reach Americans was successful in the sense that millions of Americans

1:52.7

had at least some contact with content that was produced by the Russian government or people associated with it.

2:03.3

And the goal typically was to divide Americans.

2:06.6

In some cases, they promoted miss and disinformation.

2:11.2

But in other cases, they simply highlighted real stories or real issues that divided Americans or that they thought might

2:19.0

polarize us against each other. The question, though, is what effect that effort had?

2:25.4

To answer that question, it's necessary to think about all the different kinds of information

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.