meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Politix

Alvin Bragg's Liberal Critics Are Wrong

Politix

Politix

News, News Commentary, Politics

4.61.4K Ratings

🗓️ 17 April 2024

⏱️ 22 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.politix.fm

With Matt on vacation this week, Brian hosts a conversation with Rebecca Roiphe, a New York Law School professor and former Manhattan prosecutor who enforced the very laws Donald Trump is charged with breaking in his first criminal trial. They discuss:

* Why legal commentators who criticized District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s theory of the case were factually wrong about the laws at issue and how they are applied;

* The importance of enforcing these laws, whether violators represent big businesses or small businesses, and whether their motives were financial, political, personal, or a combination thereof;

* Whether it would’ve been a breach of duty for Bragg not to bring charges in this case.

Then, paid subscribers hear a more abstract conversation about legal discourse and ethics. Why were so many legal and media elites, including many Trump critics, so eager to line up against Bragg, even as they lacked the subject-matter expertise to know whether Bragg had exceeded his mandate? Even if Bragg had gone fishing for a reason to try Trump on felony charges, would that be a violation of his ethical obligations or his oath of office? Should Trump’s status as an exceptionally high-profile political leader insulate him in any way from accountability for lower-tier felonies, even if law-enforcement officers understand him to be a serial scofflaw?

We hope you enjoy the conversation, and if you’d like to listen to the whole thing, you can upgrade to paid for a private feed that gets you access to the complete Politix archive and all future episodes.

Correction: Rebecca is a professor at New York Law School, not a New York University law school professor. Brian regrets the error.

Further reading:

* Brian on why Joe Biden should break his vow of silence and begin commenting on the hush-money case.

* Mark Joseph Stern on why he was wrong, initially, to be skeptical of Alvin Bragg’s case and what made him come around.

* There’s a new Stormy Daniels documentary on Peacock.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

How egregious would it have been for Bragg

0:02.8

confronted with this evidence about Donald Trump

0:05.6

to use his discretion not to seek charges,

0:08.4

to say, we're not going to go there. Hey everyone you're listening to a free preview of the politics

0:17.9

podcast. Matt's on vacation this week but we couldn't convince New York

0:22.4

Judge Juan Mershon to delay Donald Trump's

0:25.4

criminal hush money trial. So instead, Rebecca Royfe will ride shotgun with me for this

0:30.4

episode. Rebecca is a law professor at NYU and importantly a former

0:36.5

assistant district attorney from the same office that charged Donald

0:40.3

Trump in the Hush Money case. Unlike many, if not most of the legal experts

0:44.0

out there offering their opinions on this trial,

0:46.0

Rebecca actually enforced the laws that Trump is charged with breaking.

0:50.0

So she speaks with real authority

0:52.2

on the soundness of the case, including why so many of

0:55.8

district attorney Alvin Bragg's critics are wrong.

0:58.8

I hope you enjoy the conversation and if you want to hear the whole thing you can update your subscription to paid at politics.

1:06.0

fm.

1:07.0

Rebecca Royfe welcome to politics.

1:14.0

Thanks for having me.

1:15.2

So just for background sake, when were you an ADA in New York?

1:19.0

I was an ADA in the early 2000, so 2000 to 2005, 2001 to 2005,

1:27.0

2001 to 2005, around that time.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Politix, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Politix and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.