This is TBSI on the world.

I'm John Batchel.

The AI report with Brandon Weikert of national interests,

a senior correspondent for national security.

However, I need Brandon's attention on an article that at once seems,

well, of course, but the other time, it seems,

you mean they didn't think about it before? This is a Financial Times, London. Open AI

clamps down on security after foreign spying threats. Subhead, artificial intelligence group has

added fingerprint scans and hired military experts to protect important

data. And then there's a photograph of Sam Haltman, the boss of OpenChatGPI, which is owned

by Microsoft. Brandon, security at OpenChatGPT. I didn't think to ask because you presume that if

you're running a lab about something that is being chased

as if it's the magic formula for youth, you would have provided security at least to the level

of what's available commercially. According to this article, we're no longer surprised that

Deep Seek was able to access its database in order to manufacture its own

version of OpenChatGPI.

Do we have any thorough explanation of what they've done now?

Do we understand hiring fingerprint scans is not adequate for the world of Internet?

Good evening, too, Brandon.

Good evening, John.

Thanks for having me.

I suspect they're going to be doing more than just fingerprint scanning now.

...