Welcome back to Reasonable Faith with Dr. William Lang Craig.

It's Kevin Harris.

We're going to continue part two of the argument from contingency run through chat GPT.

In just a moment, quick reminder, check out our Reasonable Faith YouTube channels.

For Dr. Craig's famous full-length debates and lectures, go to Reasonable Faithorg.

And for those short, bite-sized answers to tough questions, visit Dr. Craig videos.

With both channels, you'll find something

that'll strengthen your faith

and spark your curiosity.

So it's Reasonable Faithorg

or Dr. Craig videos on YouTube.

And don't forget to like and subscribe.

You know that helps all these channels.

Stay up to date with all the great content that we put

out on a weekly basis. Thank you so much. And let's go to the studio with Dr. Craig. Here's the next

clip. Alex starts to distinguish abstract objects and calls our lovely AI out again. Club number eight. And would you say that something that exists

in reality, an object, like a microphone, can't just be explained by a truth, a fact like two plus two

equals four? It has to be explained by some kind of being, by some kind of thing, like a person

who puts the microphone there,

or a machine that puts it together, or the materials that make it up. It has to be another

being which explains why it exists. Yes, that's a reasonable distinction. An object like a microphone

typically requires an explanation that involves other beings or entities like people, machines and materials,

...